What is the benefit cycling on the physical health of the human being?
Sports are many
kinds. Sports person has to be excellent health. Sport ride very excellent
health grades. Especially in natural places away from industrial pollution .Therefore
we must exercise care about cycling in all ages. Because it is very important
for health .
The word
"technical" intrigue and makes others a little yawn. But there is not
much to say about the arts. And "the basis of all the features of athletic
performance.
This technique
relies on the skills better. In the broadest, most general terms, this means
eliminating unnecessary movements; making steps in the right direction;
Implement the necessary power, but no more than; Using the appropriate muscles
for the task; the optimal speed and if the weather is not a factor.
Ok is dry leaves.
However, the benefits of good technique - and the consequences of bad -
influence the formation and działanie.Ostatnią thing, I will describe your
cycling technique; drivers were much better in too many places. (See the
excellent online video).
Instead, I want
to mention some advantages of good technique.
effectiveness
The main
advantage of a good technique is efficient. Efficiency is the ratio of the
energy expenditure of work. In the case of increasing the number of personnel
or energy expenditure decreases the production efficiency is improved.
Performance and techniques are closely related, because the principle of
effectiveness are very similar to those techniques.
Many activities
have the optimal speed. Prices above and below this cost more energii.Mechanizm
that is stored muscle flexibility, which requires the shortest time between
relaxation and contraction to avoid loss of energy as heat.
Good technique
reduces the energy required to pedal, reduces energy losses, which holds more
body heat and mechanical energy for the next race. Forcing salt - the type of
functional strength.
Training to
improve your cycling technique and thus improve efficiency.
constant speed
Constant speed
also affects the technique. Acceleration or deceleration by involuntarily poor
waste energy technologies. Of course, in the possession of one rate while
walking or class is not usually part of the training plan.
But remain
consistent for a fixed term - in the middle of a song or segment, if you're in
the middle - is a significant technical skills that can improve performance.
Beatmatch (pedaling exactly in time with the music) is a training tool for the
development of cohesion.
What else
affects performance?
Efficacy may
include other factors besides technique. For example, it may depend on the
contractile properties of the muscle: slow shrinkage is more efficient fast
twitch. This may depend on the training that can increase strength and
endurance, which increases muscle performance. Big-gear train, for example, may
improve the efficiency of fast-twitch fibers.
Other technical
advantages of the well-
Doing something
with good technique feels good, probably because the body is used in the right
way.
Good technique
also look great on the bike. In my thesis, it is compared with the principles
of the technical and aesthetic principles of the movement. It turns out that
making a move correctly and efficiently is also what makes it beautiful.
So technique
leads to efficiency and less waste of energy. Less trash, more energy is for
parts requiring surgery or class when it really counts. And best of all, you'll
look and feel on the bike.
Who could argue
with the look and feel good while cycling, successfully completed a trip and
want to do it again?
My coach always
says, "endurance athletes do not mind purchasing power, but I never want
to lose." Good cycling technique is the key.
Training and /
or practice of sport is an important part of staying healthy. Nutrition is
another side. Nutrition Coaching can help you successfully achieve your goals
faster and more. I can be your expert partner responsibility, "bad
cop" soundboard and more. Let me help you change your diet and transform
your health, mood, your weight - and remained so. Please visit and check http://www.FoodAddictionSolutions.com
Services> Coaching.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joan_Kent
Why Is There So
Much Media Exposure About The Failure of Workplace Wellness Lately?
لماذا هناك الكثير من وسائل الإعلام حتى التعرض حول فشل مكان العمل العافية
في الآونة الأخيرة؟
You'd have to
be a species of Ostrich not to realize workplace wellness is now on the
receiving end of being creatively destroyed. It will soon be retired along with
the flat earth theory, rusty surgical saws, lead wine goblets, and flying steam
engines. But just think of the better ideas that followed those. Be realistic
and stay optimistic.
Nature abhors a
vacuum. And we let a huge one develop in workplace wellness by forgetting what
"wellness" was really about - helping people live full, happy lives,
and treating them with dignity and respect. But somehow it became an exercise
in penalizing people with "wrong" outcomes, classifying healthy
people as patients, getting them to do stuff they don't want to do, poking them
with needles, and prying into their private lives. In the process of executing
these terrible ideas, based on faulty data, over a long period of time, we've
arrived at a tipping point.
The Dynamic Duo
How Al Lewis
(think IBM®'s super computer, Watson, but with the addition of a law degree and
a wicked sense of humor) met Vik Khanna (a descendant of Genghis Khan?), I
don't know. But they're the dynamic duo behind the creative destruction coming
soon to a workplace wellness program near you. They call themselves, "Partners
In Rationality." I totally get that after observing the whacky world of
workplace wellness for the last 20 years.
The price for a
barrel of rationality is at an all-time high in wellness, so Lewis and Khanna
have a valuable commodity to sell.
The information
that has posed as valid wellness research for so many years is nonsense. The
math simply doesn't work. I even worked it out with just my bio-fueled, C+
grade brain, and a calculator. See "Workplace Wellness ROI: A Simple Way To
Verify."
And make sure
and check out this highly relevant, recent Health Affairs article,
"Workplace Wellness Produces No Savings" by Lewis, Khanna, and
Montrose, and then read through the comments. It's a lively, civil, and
productive debate, which is long overdue.
Lewis also
keeps offering the "researchers" who are targets of his highly
detailed, mathematical criticisms multi-thousand dollar rewards to refute his
claims or debate him openly. In effect proving, once again that extrinsic
incentives don't work, because nobody takes him up on the challenge. Lewis is
often vilified in closed forums and cut-off from participating, or defending
himself in those webinar, bully fests. It was exactly that cold-shoulder
approach to this guy that got me more interested in who he was. And it turns
out he's the guy who confronts the bully in the hall and punches him in the
nose. I don't like bullies. I was sold.
How the ACA is
helping to accelerate the demise of workplace wellness as we know it
The ACA (aka
Obama Care) and its high level focus on workplace wellness (based on false
data), via its subsidy to support incentives (which have never worked), have
enticed workplaces to engage in practices that inevitably attracted law suits
by the EEOC, and soon to come, many others. It's no surprise the major media
outlets are now taking notice. And guess who the journalist like? That's right,
Watson (Lewis) and Genghis Khan (Khanna). They're controversial, in-your-face,
funny, and can go to a deadly serious mode with math and other statistics as
fast as Hawkeye Pierce of the 4077th, M*A*S*H Unit knew it was time to surgeon
up.
Here's the most
recent major media story using these guys as a source, "Why 'wellness'
program scams cost employers and harm employees," by Michael Hiltzik of
The Los Angeles Times. And the hits just keep on rolling. The big media outlets
are now "all-in" on the debate.
As creative
destruction reigns, chaos is starting to take a turn. There are three types of
characters to be aware of as Workplace Wellness goes through its metamorphosis
of worm to butterfly.
1. Ostriches (or Klingons?): Wellness companies,
organizations, and their owners and officers who think workplace wellness is
fine as is. They dig in their heels, and are vague or silent in defending the
specific failings cited in their methods. They send out email promotions like
"Wellness Still Works," "The Critics Are Wrong," etc.
They're immune to the reality of math, the dependability of good science, the
blessings of common sense, and empathy for the human condition. Sometimes they
present as academicians or doctors. They just want you to shut-up and listen to
their wisdom. I secretly suspect they're Klingons.
2. Charlatans & Imposters: These are the ones
who use Homonyms. That means the same words can have different meanings. For
example, a politician might use the word "freedom" but could actually
mean you'll be shot if you try to cross a border. See how that works?
"Cultures of health," and "healthy workplace cultures"
don't get that way by using extrinsic incentives, cattle prods, bio-metric
screening, HRAs, ROI claims data metrics, and weight loss contests. Beware of
anybody using those terms or programs with those tactics! It's the same wolf in
sheep's clothing. Want to know what healthy workplace cultures are really about
read, "How to Build a Thriving Culture at Work, Featuring The 7 Points of
Transformation"*, by Rosie Ward and Jon Robison.
3. Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves: These are the
"professionals." The authoritative, serious looking people, usually
impeccably attired, often self-proclaimed experts in employee benefits.
Sometimes they'll do group photo ops with other members of their gangs. Their
message: "We're a lot smarter than you and we're here to set you
straight." Their role in your life is to increase complexity, drama, and
costs. They help workplaces "navigate" the ACA regulations, the EEOC
law suits, be in HIPAA compliance, and walk that fine line of protecting
confidentiality as their clients extract information from employees that is
none of their business. All of which nobody would have to worry about if they'd
just run a good business and quit prodding everyone to do stuff they don't want
to do.
Besides, all
there is to know about healthful lifestyles is available for free on the
Intelligence For Your Life radio show with John Tesh. Plus you get to listen to
some great music. Pipe that into your workplace. What could be better?
My advice.
Believe Lewis and Khanna, they're right about what is wrong with wellness. And
respect their capabilities to destroy the current workplace wellness model.
They're doing it as you read this. And then see what Ward and Robison have to
say in the book mentioned above. These are some of the key players behind the
creative destruction of wellness as we know it, and a new developing paradigm
of how we think about life and work.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Shawn_Connors
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)

No comments :
Post a Comment